It’s like I’ve been telling you, the Supreme Court will be tasked to insure the fidelity and integrity of the election.
‘Ballot harvesting’ (allowing political operatives and others to collect voters’ ballots and turn them in en masse to polling stations) is ripe for fraud, interference and voter has drawn bipartisan concerns of fraud from election watchers.
PHOENIX — The Supreme Court said Friday it will review a 2016 Arizona law that bars anyone but a family member or caregiver from returning another person’s early ballot.
The law itself, however, remains in effect through the presidential election and until the justices rule.
A federal appeals court ruled in January that Arizona’s law banning so-called “ballot harvesting” violates the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution, but the court put its ruling on hold while the Supreme Court was asked to take the case.
